| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 454 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. vs Jayaram Chigurupati and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 383409]
|
CLB |
2009 |
Descon Ltd. vs DPSC Ltd. and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 391951]
|
CLB |
2009 |
Gautam Buddha Children's Hospital (P) Ltd. vs UOI
Application to strike off the name of company-Name struck off by Registrar without sending notice-An application was filed by the directors of the company before the Registrar to strike off the name of the company on account of disputes and differe [LexDoc Id : 392250]
|
HC (Patna) |
2009 |
Dharamshil Cold Storage (P) Ltd. vs UOI
Restoration of name of company in Register of Companies-Name of company struck off due to failure to file returns for three years-As a matter of fact, the Registrar of Companies did not even wait for the statutory three months period before passing the order, rather the final ord [LexDoc Id : 380175]
|
HC (Patna) |
2009 |
Kumar Narayanan vs R. Keerthana and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 380205]
|
CLB |
2009 |
Chetan K. Singh vs Citi Bank and Ors.
Avoidance of transfers, etc., after commencement of winding up-Attachment and sale of property pursuant to orders of DRT-A winding up petition was instituted subsequent to the filing of petition before DRT and after attachment order had been passed. The sale of property [LexDoc Id : 395190]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2009 |
Ishwar Industries Ltd. vs Lakshmi Machine Works Ltd. (No. 1)
Winding up petition: Alleged amount payable not yet determined-Petition not maintainable till amount determined-An appeal was continuation of the original proceeding. Whether the dispute was pending as a suit or arbitration did not make any difference for windin [LexDoc Id : 392714]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2009 |
Chettinadu Constructions vs Muthukumarasamy Textiles Ltd.
Maintainability of winding up petition-Application under s.11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996-The high court, noting that the petitioner had already filed application under s.11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 for appointment of an [LexDoc Id : 392713]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2009 |
Birla Corpn. Ltd. vs State of Bihar and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 386586]
|
HC (Patna) |
2009 |
Phalashri Estates (P) Ltd. vs ROC
Restoration of name of company: Name of company struck off from Register of Companies-No notice given to company, Company making a case for restoration of its name-The petitioner-company was incorporated to carry on the business of builders, contractors, erectors, construction of buildings, etc. According to the [LexDoc Id : 385491]
|
HC (Madhya Pradesh) |
2009 |
Pithampur Petro-Pharma (P) Ltd. vs ROC
Restoration of name of company: Name struck off from Register-Name ordered to be restored in view of averments made in petition-The petitioner-company was incorporated with an object to manufacture certain products. It came to know through the Portal of Ministry of Corporate Af [LexDoc Id : 384809]
|
HC (Madhya Pradesh) |
2009 |
Pashupati Agro Mills (P) Ltd. vs ROC
Restoration of name of company: Name struck off-Company in operation as per audited balance sheet-The petitioner-company was incorporated under the Companies Act 1956 as a company limited by shares. The petitioner-company stated that when it approa [LexDoc Id : 384642]
|
HC (Madhya Pradesh) |
2009 |
BNS Steel Trading (P) Ltd. vs Orissa Sponge Iron and Steel Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 389986]
|
CLB |
2009 |
H. Ramesh and Ors. vs Aparna Theatres (P) Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 380210]
|
CLB |
2009 |
Pramod Chandak vs UOI and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 409921]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2009 |
Grid Corpn. of Orissa Ltd. (GRIDCO) vs Southern Electricity Supply Co. of Orissa (SOUTHCO), Western Electricity Supply Co. of Orissa (WESTCO) and North Eastern Electricity Supply Co. of Orissa (NESCO)
[LexDoc Id : 393812]
|
CLB |
2009 |
Babita Bhardwaj vs BB Corporate Services (P) Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 383275]
|
CLB |
2009 |
Asian Tiles Ltd., In re
[LexDoc Id : 400129]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2009 |
Uttra Achyut Chinubhai and Ors. vs OL of Nanikram Shobhraj Mills and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 386428]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2009 |
Tungabadra Sugar Works Mazdoor Sangh vs Subhash Kathuria and Ors.
Orders of winding up court: Binding on recovery officer-Sale and its confirmation by recovery officer-The bank had applied to the company court and obtained an order. Such order was binding on the recovery officer also. The order made it clear that the [LexDoc Id : 386100]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2009 |
Hetal Alpesh Muchhala vs Adityesh Educational Institute and Ors.
Appeal to the high court: Appeal from an order of CLB-Delay beyond extended period under s.10F not condonable-The high court, on a question whether the provisions of s.5 of the Limitation Act 1963 were applicable to an appeal filed under s.10F of the Companies [LexDoc Id : 379133]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2009 |
Shree Balaji Cinevision India (P) Ltd., In re
[LexDoc Id : 399553]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2009 |
Shree Balaji Cinevision India (P) Ltd., In re
[LexDoc Id : 395746]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2009 |
Amerzinc Products (P) Ltd., In re
Power of court to alter or modify scheme-Power including modification of or alteration in appointed date-The high court, while exercising the powers for sanctioning of the scheme, was also empowered to alter or modify the scheme and such power would also [LexDoc Id : 386022]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2009 |
N. Vamadevan vs Sree Narayana Dharma Paripalana Yogana and Ors.
Winding up: Power to restrain fraudulent persons from managing companies-Prayer for winding up raised as an alternative prayer-The power to restrain fraudulent persons from managing the companies as provided in s.203 of the Companies Act 1956 could be exercised only in the cou [LexDoc Id : 384808]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2009 |
| |
| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| |
